The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gaming.

No, they weren't personally in participation, but the world-famous stars were notably consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial sites offering both complimentary casino-style video games and financially rewarding rewards, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as conventional casinos, only without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income last year alone. Now the business deals with accusations of unlawful gambling in a New york city lawsuit that claims VGW uses star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration below)

'I'm not sure" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of celebs from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any differences between traditional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes casinos found online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many - but not all - games are complimentary

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly touts on social networks

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the potential for real gaming losses.

Others tempt customers with guarantees of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad flaunting Drake's vehicles, aircrafts and estates before rotating to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never gave up.'

The discrepancy in between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complex, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, most of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.

'Most social sweeps customers never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the common deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling sites.'

Social gambling establishments use customers a possibility to play casino-style games with buddies. Players have the choice to buy worthless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real money, but can be utilized to unlock different functions within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling customers to obtain other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7 states, which has helped to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't require usually require identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to submit mail-in ask for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the gamers follow painfully particular instructions. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, thereby providing a factor to attempt their hands at any number of casino games for a chance to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a method of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never need to spend for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a vital distinction between social sweeps and traditional online gambling websites like gambling establishments.'

Think of the method that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that provide them the possibility to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself does not meet the meaning of gambling in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all kinds of everyday services in the United States, everything from hamburgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely used by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many gambling market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last permanently and they're usually not tied to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities typically related to McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payouts, generally 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the common payment percentage for a momentary promotional sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the profits earned by the business [normally less than one percent]'

Wallach is quick to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the web coffee shops that emerged in Florida, offering customers the opportunity to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. Many of those brick-and-mortar establishments have because been shuttered over claims of prohibited sports betting.

DJ Khaled is among numerous celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos should deal with comparable analysis.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually repeatedly been mentioned by courts and state attorney generals as crucial consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion remained in truth a guise for prohibited gaming.'

Among the gambling establishment industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up significant tax and revenue opportunities as this gaming changes that performed through regulated channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current suit, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'illegal sports betting business. '

Apple and Google have also been named as defendants in suits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.

'We usually do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only just been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games across most of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, creating not just terrific video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but likewise guaranteeing this is done safely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively common across the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to strongly defend any claim which might be brought against us.'

The issues between traditional online gaming and sweepstakes casinos might show bothersome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to project a strong position against prohibited gambling - especially when trying to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably prohibited sports betting sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also overlooked to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a duty to explain to clients the distinctions and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our company practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'Some of our worths are" our players come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who lend their names to shady illegal gambling websites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at risk along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state lawyers general rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating prohibited gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton