The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, but the world-famous stars were notably consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable sites using both free casino-style games and profitable rewards, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of lots of gaming corporations, not to point out claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as conventional gambling establishments, only without the oversight, consumer protections and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal sports betting levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the company faces allegations of prohibited gambling in a New york city suit that declares VGW uses star endorsers to 'develop a veneer of authenticity' around its product. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm uncertain" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions in between conventional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - video games are free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely promotes on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements normally focus around the social element of the gambling establishments, while omitting the capacity for actual gambling losses.

Others tempt consumers with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad displaying Drake's vehicles, airplanes and estates before rotating to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever quit.'

The discrepancy in between gambling websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are sports betting free.

'Most social sweeps consumers never purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social casinos use customers an opportunity to play casino-style games with pals. Players have the alternative to buy worthless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, but can be utilized to open numerous features within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting clients to obtain other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad showing off Drake's vehicles, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has helped to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require typically need recognition. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit consumers to submit mail-in requests for complimentary sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully particular directions. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, thereby providing a factor to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a means of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are simply a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never have to spend for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital distinction in between social sweeps and standard online gaming websites like gambling establishments.'

Think about the way that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the possibility to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself does not fulfill the meaning of gambling in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all sort of daily organizations in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are routinely utilized by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling industry experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, thereby suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're usually not connected to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities typically associated with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payments, normally 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the typical payout percentage for a short-lived advertising sweepstakes is a trivial share of the earnings made by the business [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the web cafes that emerged in Florida, providing consumers the chance to play casino-style video games for genuine rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have since been shuttered over claims of unlawful gaming.

DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments should deal with similar examination.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually consistently been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as essential elements in figuring out that a sweepstakes promo remained in reality a guise for unlawful sports betting.'

One of the casino industry's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being deprived of securities and states are giving up considerable tax and income chances as this gambling replaces that conducted through regulated channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the newest claim, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'prohibited gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have likewise been named as accuseds in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We usually don't comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games throughout most of North America, as we have for more than a years, creating not only fantastic video games, user experiences and entertainment, but likewise ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are reasonably typical throughout the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to strongly protect any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The concerns between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the very same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong stance against prohibited gaming - particularly when trying to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting supposedly prohibited sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also disregarded to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their star endorsers have an obligation to discuss to customers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our business practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our worths are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who lend their names to shady unlawful gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk along with courting civil and class actions by customers who allege damage,' Glaser said. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state lawyers general rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with prohibited sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton