Biofuels: 'Irrational' and 'worse than fossil fuels'
The UK's "irrational" usage of biofuels will cost vehicle drivers around ₤ 460 million over the next 12 months, a think tank says.
A report by Chatham House, external states the growing reliance on sustainable liquid fuels will likewise increase food prices.
The author says that biodiesel made from vegetable oil was worse for the environment than nonrenewable fuel sources.
Under EU law, external, biofuels are set to make up 5% of the UK's transportation fuel from today.
Since 2008, the UK has actually required fuel suppliers to include a growing proportion of sustainable products into the fuel and diesel they supply. These biofuels are generally ethanol distilled from corn and biodiesel made from rapeseed, used cooking oil and tallow.
Deep fried fuel
But research performed for Chatham House says that reaching the 5% level implies that UK drivers will have to pay an additional ₤ 460m a year because of the higher expense of fuel at the pump and from filling more frequently as biofuels have a lower energy content.
The report say that if the UK is to fulfill its responsibilities to EU energy targets the expense to vehicle drivers is most likely to rise to ₤ 1.3 bn per year by 2020.
"It is difficult to find any good news," Rob Bailey, senior research fellow at Chatham House, told BBC News.
"Biofuels increase costs and they are a very pricey way to decrease carbon emissions," he stated.
The EU biofuel requireds are likewise having extremely distorting impacts in the market. Because utilized cooking oil is considered one of the most sustainable kinds of biodiesel, the cost for it has actually risen quickly. Rob Bailey says that towards the end of 2012 it was more expensive than refined palm oil.
"It creates a financial incentive to buy refined palm oil, cook a chip in it to turn it into utilized cooking oil and after that sell it at profit,"
"It is crazy however the rewards exist."
There are likewise worries that taking EU land out of production to grow rapeseed oil in particular is creating more climate problems than it resolves. The more fuel of this type that is taken into cars the larger the deficit created in the edible oils market. This had actually lead to increased imports of palm oil from Indonesia, often produced on deforested land.
"Once you consider these indirect effects, biofuels made from vegetable oils really result worldwide in more emissions than you would get from utilizing diesel in the first place," said Rob Bailey.
"Plus you are asking drivers to pay more for the fuel - it makes no sense, it is an entirely irrational technique."
Biofuel benefits
The European Biodiesel Board (EBB), which represents the industry, external across the EU, said it knew the issues caused by the mandate. But it thinks that biofuels have lots of positives.
"Blaming biofuels for all the problems on the planet is a bit too overstated," said Isabelle Maurizi, task manager at the EBB.
"It has actually brought great deals of advantages. It has actually enhanced the security of our diesel; it has reduced EU dependency on animal feed imports, thanks to the rapeseed we grow for biodiesel."
"If there was no biodiesel farmers would just make their land idle - no food, no feed!"
As the UK hits the 5% of liquid fuels mark, the government deals with some tough decisions on how to progress on this problem as it deals with tripling the expenses for drivers by 2020.
Insiders recommend its choice would be to attempt and get agreement in Brussels on the effects of indirect costs which may constrain what counts as biofuel. However getting agreement from countries with effective agricultural sectors who benefit from the present plan will be tough.
"When you have a lobby which consists of the agricultural sector and the oil sector it is very tough for Governments to make a U-turn," said Rob Bailey.
County begins recycling chip fat
8 December 2010
How does Qantas fly on chip fat? Video, 00:02:00 How does Qantas fly on chip fat?
13 April 2012
Measuring energy crops' footprint
18 October 2012
