For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a friend - my really own "very popular" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.
Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.
It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It mimics my chatty style of composing, addsub.wiki but it's likewise a bit repeated, wolvesbaneuo.com and extremely verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And larsaluarna.se there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.
There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source large language model.
I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, orcz.com who produced it, can purchase any more copies.
There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and joy".
Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.
He hopes to broaden his range, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.
It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.
"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.
"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."
In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and ratemywifey.com they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.
"I do not think using generative AI for innovative functions need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's build it morally and fairly."
OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.
The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' material on the internet to help establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".
He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.
"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is undermining among its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of development."
A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them license their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI designers."
Under the UK government's new AI plan, grandtribunal.org a national data library including public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI researchers.
In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.
But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.
This comes as a number of claims versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for it.
If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.
When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.
But given how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not sure how long I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.
Outside the UK? Register here.